It’s all in a name. Until, well, it’s not.
Imagine this: You sit down to select a mutual fund to invest in, and after looking over a few options, you select the one with the word “preservation” in the description. Why? Well, it says “preservation” and, with the market near all-time highs, you want to make sure you preserve what you have. You make the investment. A few days later you login to your account to check on your balance, and the results are stunning. (And not in your favor.)
Thousands of investors did just that, tossing money into the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund Class A mutual fund. Look what happened to their investment given the recent market volatility:
The $772 million LJM Preservation and Growth Fund’s share price plummeted from $9.67 to $4.27—a 55.8% decline. To make matters worse, the fund (ticker: LJMAX) didn’t report the loss until late the following day, so shareholders were in the dark as to what had happened. The fund then suffered another 54.6% fall, to $1.94 a share on Feb. 6—for a two-day total decline of 80%. This is probably the largest two-day loss for a mutual fund…ever.
How does something like this happen? Well, for starters, it appears that the fund sold naked put options on S&P 500 futures, and it was way over-leveraged. In all fairness, many investors might not even understand what that means (“naked put options” are contracts that give the buyer the right but not the obligation to sell (put) shares at a particular price and future date. Since a “naked” writer does not hold a position in the underlying security represented in the options contract, the investor is exposed to more risk, according to Investopedia.com).Plus, in this case, this approachwas not transparently disclosed.
Investors do understand one thing: preservation.
The reason this fund had “preservation” in the fund name was for one reason: marketing. Investors often make their fund selections by name alone. This fund was marketed as a capital preservation tool. Educated investors know to look at a fund’s performance over its title; obviously selecting a fund by name only can be a dangerous strategy.
At The Retirement Planning Group, we look “under the hood” of all the funds we recommend to our clients. While every fund has a specific name to help investors gauge its strategy, wise advisors use their tools and knowledge to dig deeper. Sometimes we find the fund has the latitude to invest in other areas. Knowing about these “other areas” helps keep investors out of trouble.
Merely selecting a fund by its name can have disastrous consequences. As an investor, you scrimp, save and sacrifice to amass the money to invest. Be sure you’re doing exhaustive research on all the funds you invest in. If not, be sure you’re working with an advisor who does.
- The Worst Way to Pick a Mutual Fund is Often the Most Popular. - February 21, 2018
- Take a Cue from Soccer on Recent Market Volatility - February 13, 2018
- After a Record Year for Stocks, What Should Investors Do in 2018? - January 24, 2018
- How the Federal Interest Rate Hike Could Impact You - December 19, 2017
- Quarter Update and Retirement News - October 25, 2017
- Could Black Monday Happen Again? - October 18, 2017
- Market Update - July 18, 2017
- Our Thoughts on the Election Results - November 9, 2016
- How Do Elections Impact your Portfolio? - October 11, 2016
- Markets Shrug off Brexit - July 22, 2016